🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders asks for plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a pending law that include lowering the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

It comes amid broader worries about industry interference with public health regulations. In recent weeks, international health experts sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be reduced to 30% or 50% “according to global guideline limits”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities actually suggests a warning should cover at least 50% of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill proposes sanctions for different infractions “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the managing director of British American Tobacco Zambia says the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but asserts that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We exist in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and harvest that and market the products – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator stated: “The corporation runs its activities following with applicable local laws. Additionally, the company participates in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which provide for relevant group engagement in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, noting that young individuals should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to achieve intended public health goals, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” they said, adding that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the Zambian market and smoking product business, which involves rising levels of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.