🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

According to a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $17,000 for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now the government is shut down because partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. How medical professionals get paid changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee making moderate income must contribute approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you compare it to what the typical American pays. I can name multiple clients that are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, those payments also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like many our government's military, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make administration much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complex (and fruitless) process of bargaining with major insurers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – contrasted with the current system where they have to interpret the complications of current options. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer have access to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid current situation could be that we take serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms need to happen.